New Rules Define Implementation of Mental Health and Addiction Parity
It’s been a very long road, but the addiction and mental health fields have cleared another hurdle with the recent release of federal rules that define how mental health and addiction parity must be implemented.
Interim final rules jointly issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) prohibit group health insurance plans that offer mental health and substance use disorder benefits from restricting access to care by limiting benefits or requiring higher out-of-pocket costs than those that apply to general medical and surgical coverage (75 Fed. Reg., 5410-5451). The new rules, which implement the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA), apply to employers with 50 or more workers whose group health plan chooses to offer mental health or substance use disorder benefits, and are effective April 5, applicable to insurance plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2010.
The new rules, issued Feb. 2, enforce requirements with regard to quantitative and non-quantitative treatment limits for mental health and substance use disorders, which may be “applied no more stringently” than those for medical or surgical coverage. Quantitative treatment limits are numerically imposed, such as limits on the number of outpatient visits or number of days spent inpatient at a treatment facility. Non-quantitative limits are other provisions that may affect the scope or duration of benefits under the plan, including: medical management standards, such as preauthorization and case review; determination of usual and customary and reasonable amounts; and requirements for using low-cost therapies before the plan will cover more expensive therapies.
Additionally, the rule specifies six classifications of benefits: inpatient in network; inpatient out-of-network; outpatient in network; outpatient out-of-network; emergency care; and prescription drugs. Basically, if a plan provides any benefits for a mental health condition or substance use disorder under, benefits must be provided for that condition or disorder in each classification for which any medical surgical benefits are provided, according to the rule.
Comments on the interim final regulation are due by May 3, 2010, and may be emailed to the federal rulemaking portal at: http://www.regulations.gov. Comments will be shared among the three agencies, and therefore, should be submitted only once to one of the following agencies, and should include the appropriate file code: for HHS, CMS-4140-IFC; for DOL, RIN 1210-AB30; for the Treasury’s Internal Revenue Service, REG-120692-09.
For more news and information on issues relevant to the addiction treatment field, please visit www.counselormagazine.com.
Tags: "addiction", "insurance", "mental health", "parity", "regulations", "substance use disorders", addiction equity act of 2008, federal parity law, group health insurance parity, health care coverage parity, medical coverage parity, mental and substance abuse parity, mental health and substance abuse, mental health benefits parity law, mental health insurance, mental health insurance benefits, mental health parity act, mental health parity under obama, mental health services, new rules require parity, obama administration issues parity rules, parity act, parity addiction treatment, parity coverage, parity in treatment, prohibit treatment limits, substance abuse treatment

Interesting article and a good news for addiction medicine.
Thank you for such a fantastic blog. Where else could one get this kind of info written in such an incite full way? I have a presentation that I am just now working on, and I have been looking for such information
Just what I needed! Maybe that will be my inspiration for the week, keep it coming!
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We got a very good book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your data. I am really glad to determine such info which I was browsing for a long time.This made us very glad!
My friend referred me to your blog, so I thought I’d come have a read. Very interesting material, will be back for more!
Thank you for the advice. I’ve found your first point to be most effective.
Found your web blog on msn, plenty of awesome content on here, keep up the good work.